Incentivising excellence, attracting high-achieving teaching candidates

Authored on
2 years 8 months ago
Complete
Project Type
Advisory report
Policy Area
Education
Partner agencies
Department of Education, Skills and Employment (DESE)

Quality teachers help their students excel. In recent years, however, there has been a decline in high-achieving young adults and university-educated mid-career professionals choosing teaching as their career. This report outlines BETA’s research, commissioned by the Quality Initial Teacher Education Review, into what incentives young high-achievers and mid-career professionals find most attractive when considering a career in teaching.

To answer this question we ran an online survey containing a discrete choice experiment with 501 young high achievers and 1,432 mid-career professionals. We used the discrete choice experiment to quantify the relative importance of various incentives related to work and study, as well as a teacher’s starting and top pay.

  • For young high-achievers, a $30,000 scholarship was the most effective work or study incentive, followed by guaranteed ongoing employment in a nearby school (both increased the probability of choosing a teaching job by around 12%). Most study and all work incentives were valued greater than a $15,000 increase to starting or top pay.
  • For mid-career professionals, paid work throughout study, a $30,000 scholarship, mortgage/rent relief and guaranteed ongoing employment in a nearby school were the most impactful work and study related incentives.

Attracting high-achieving candidates to the teaching profession requires a careful mix of incentives and remuneration packages. This research contributes to the discussion on how such packages could be constructed.

ADDITIONAL TRIAL INFORMATION

Trial start and end dates:

22/07/2021, 9/08/2021

Ethics approval:

Macquarie University Human Research Ethics (ref: 520211038330091)

Research participants:

Our population of interest was young high-achievers (N = 501) and mid-career professionals (N = 1432) who had never studied teaching or worked as a teacher. Young high-achievers were defined as 18-25 year olds who scored an Australian Tertiary Admission Rank (ATAR) of 80 or above (or an Overall Position greater than 11 or an International Baccalaureate less than 23). Mid-career professionals were defined as 26-60 year olds who had a Bachelor’s degree or higher.

Design:

We tested four types of incentives: study, work, starting pay and top pay via a discrete choice experiment. To analyse the discrete choice experiment results, we fitted a mixed-effects logit regression. Choice of a teaching package (0 = did not choose vs 1 = did choose) was regressed on a categorical study incentives variable, a categorical work incentives variable, and two continuous variables for starting pay and top pay. We reported the marginal probabilities of choosing a career in teaching for each incentive, while holding all other incentives at the ‘baseline’ value.